WEKO3
アイテム
ハーバーマスにおける討議倫理学の基本構想
https://morioka.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/3739
https://morioka.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/373903d5cb47-b28e-4bf2-9161-56c705703e8c
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004192569.pdf (1.5 MB)
|
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-12-15 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | ハーバーマスにおける討議倫理学の基本構想 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | On the Integrative Program in Habermas's Discourse Ethics | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | ハーバーマス ニオケル トウギリンリガク ノ キホンコウゾウ | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja-Kana | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
日暮, 雅夫
× 日暮, 雅夫
|
|||||||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| 値 | 盛岡大学英米文学科 | |||||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This article tries to articulate what is embodied by the basic architecture of Habermas's discourse ethics. It goes on to analyze the ground concept and formulation of the discourse ethics that Habermas presents in the 'Chapter 3: Discourse Ethics' in his Moral Consciousness and Communicative Actions, elucidating the features of his formulation of the key concepts in discourse ethics. Habermas raises the point that J. Rawls, E. Tugendhat, K.-O. Apel and related philosophers are those heorists that adopt Kantian approach and have offered a unified interpretation of what they have attempted in his analyses of the conditions for evaluation that are based upon political impartiality and grounded on ascertained arguments. Habermas thinks of Apel's approach, i.e., his theory of discourse ethics as the most promising. This paper quotes several passages from Habermas's work that demonstrate that Habermas's approach has many affinities with Apel's discourse ethics. Their shared orientations are detectable in the fact that they both try to defend the cognitive approach to ethics against Worth Skepticisms and that they answer the questions of how moral order and norms can be founded. However, I would like to point out that gradually Habermas departs from Apel and clearly makes his own view of a discourse theory. He arrives at a conclusion to the effect that the term discourse ethics, itself is inadequate as the representation of his whole discourse theory. | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 盛岡大学紀要 en : The journal of Morioka University 巻 22, p. 49-62, 発行日 2005-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00240690 | |||||||||||
| 表示順 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 7 | |||||||||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00004192569 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02860643 | |||||||||||
